PT-2026-45064 · Pypi · Praisonai-Platform
Publicado
2026-05-29
·
Atualizado
2026-05-29
·
CVE-2026-47410
CVSS v3.1
9.8
Crítica
| Vetor | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Summary
Type: Insecure default cryptographic key. The JWT signing secret defaults to the hardcoded literal
"dev-secret-change-me" when PLATFORM JWT SECRET is unset. A safety check exists but only fires when PLATFORM ENV != "dev"; the default value of PLATFORM ENV is "dev", so the check is silently bypassed in any deployment that does not explicitly opt out. The attacker reads the literal from this public source file, mints a JWT with arbitrary sub and email claims, and authenticates as any existing user (including workspace owners and admins).
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai platform/services/auth service.py, lines 25-36 and 114-137.
Root cause: the production-mode guard checks os.environ.get("PLATFORM ENV", "dev") != "dev" — but the default is "dev", so a clean deployment that just imports the package and runs uvicorn praisonai platform.api.app:app proceeds with the hardcoded secret. The package documentation does not warn loudly enough that BOTH variables must be set; the guard suppresses itself when either condition is missed. JWT verification at line 129 trusts whatever the token says (sub, email, name) once the HMAC-SHA256 signature validates against the publicly-known secret. Since the verifier accepts forged tokens for any user id, the attacker becomes that user across every authenticated route.Affected Code
File:
src/praisonai-platform/praisonai platform/services/auth service.py, lines 25-36 and 114-137.python
DEFAULT SECRET = "dev-secret-change-me"
JWT SECRET = os.environ.get("PLATFORM JWT SECRET", DEFAULT SECRET) # <-- BUG: silent fallback
JWT ALGORITHM = "HS256"
JWT TTL SECONDS = int(os.environ.get("PLATFORM JWT TTL", str(30 * 24 * 3600)))
if JWT SECRET == DEFAULT SECRET and os.environ.get("PLATFORM ENV", "dev") != "dev":
raise RuntimeError( # <-- only fires if PLATFORM ENV is non-default
"PLATFORM JWT SECRET must be set to a strong random value in production. "
"Set PLATFORM ENV=dev to suppress this check during development."
)
# ...
def issue token(self, user: User) -> str:
payload = {
"sub": user.id,
"email": user.email,
"name": user.name,
"iat": now,
"exp": now + timedelta(seconds=JWT TTL SECONDS),
}
return jwt.encode(payload, JWT SECRET, algorithm=JWT ALGORITHM) # signs with the hardcoded secret
def verify token(self, token: str) -> Optional[AuthIdentity]:
try:
payload = jwt.decode(token, JWT SECRET, algorithms=[JWT ALGORITHM]) # verifies with the hardcoded secret
return AuthIdentity(
id=payload["sub"], # <-- attacker chooses sub
type="user",
email=payload.get("email"),
name=payload.get("name"),
)
except jwt.InvalidTokenError:
return NoneWhy it's wrong: the guard's predicate is wrong. The intent — "warn loudly if a production deployment ships without setting the secret" — is correct, but the implementation requires the operator to set BOTH variables (
PLATFORM JWT SECRET and PLATFORM ENV != "dev") for the guard to fire. A common deployment misconfiguration is to set only one (or neither): pip install praisonai-platform, uvicorn praisonai platform.api.app:app --host 0.0.0.0, done. The package starts with no warning, the JWT signing key is the literal string sitting in this source file, and any attacker who reads the GitHub repo can forge tokens. The standard pattern is to fail-closed at import time when the secret is the default, regardless of any environment variable. The code at line 32-36 inverts that: it fails-open by default and only fails-closed when the operator opts in.Exploit Chain
- Attacker reads
auth service.py:25from the public GitHub repo (MervinPraison/PraisonAI) and notesDEFAULT SECRET = "dev-secret-change-me". State: attacker holds the JWT signing key. - Attacker identifies a target deployment of
praisonai-platform(Shodan search for the FastAPI route/auth/me, thepraisonai platformuser-agent, or any indexed installation). Attacker registers a free account atPOST /auth/registerto confirm the deployment is live and to obtain at least one valid JWT token whose structure they can copy. State: attacker holds a live account. - Attacker enumerates the platform's user IDs via any of the IDOR primitives filed as separate advisories (issue
created by, agentowner id, commentauthor id, member list via the workspace-member-IDOR), or simply queries/auth/mewith their own token to learn the UUID format. State: attacker has a target user UUIDT id(e.g. a workspace owner of any tenant). - Attacker forges a JWT:
python
import jwt, time
payload = {"sub": "T id", "email": "victim@example.com", "name": "victim",
"iat": int(time.time()), "exp": int(time.time()) + 3600}
token = jwt.encode(payload, "dev-secret-change-me", algorithm="HS256")State: attacker holds a JWT that the deployment's
verify token will accept as authentic.
5. Attacker sends GET /auth/me with Authorization: Bearer <forged token>. verify token decodes the token using JWT SECRET = "dev-secret-change-me", the HMAC matches, an AuthIdentity(id="T id", ...) is returned. The route resolves the actual User row by User.id == "T id" and returns the victim's record. State: attacker is authenticated as the victim.
6. Attacker pivots: POST /workspaces/{id}/members to add themselves as owner (chaining with the companion priv-esc advisory becomes redundant — the attacker is already the victim), PATCH /workspaces/{id} to flip settings, DELETE /workspaces/{id} to wipe data, or simply GET /workspaces/{id}/issues/... to exfiltrate everything the victim could read.
7. Final state: full account takeover for any user id on any deployment that did not explicitly set both PLATFORM JWT SECRET and PLATFORM ENV=production. No prior auth, no user interaction, no special network position required.Security Impact
Severity: sec-critical. CVSS 9.8: network attack, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, scope unchanged (the JWT layer is the same component the attacker pivots through), high confidentiality, high integrity, high availability (chaining with
delete workspace from the companion advisory).
Attacker capability: mint a JWT for any user id on the deployment with the public secret, becoming that user across every authenticated route. No prior authentication required — the attacker only needs the package to be deployed and reachable. This is a pre-auth full account takeover.
Preconditions: praisonai-platform is deployed without explicitly setting BOTH PLATFORM JWT SECRET AND PLATFORM ENV=<non-dev>. The default deployment pattern (pip install, uvicorn ...) hits this. The attacker needs network reachability to the API.
Differential: source-inspection-verified end-to-end. The asymmetry is between the documented intent of the guard (warn in production) and its actual semantics (warn only when the operator sets PLATFORM ENV to a non-"dev" value). With the suggested fix below, the guard fails-closed: any deployment that did not set PLATFORM JWT SECRET raises at import time, regardless of PLATFORM ENV. The forged-token attack returns None from verify token because the signing key the attacker used ("dev-secret-change-me") no longer matches the deployment's secret.Suggested Fix
Fail-closed at import time when the secret is the default, irrespective of
PLATFORM ENV. Permit explicit dev-mode opt-in with a separate variable that is NEVER the default.diff
--- a/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai platform/services/auth service.py
+++ b/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai platform/services/auth service.py
@@ -23,12 +23,16 @@
pwd context = CryptContext(schemes=["bcrypt"], deprecated="auto")
- DEFAULT SECRET = "dev-secret-change-me"
-JWT SECRET = os.environ.get("PLATFORM JWT SECRET", DEFAULT SECRET)
+JWT SECRET = os.environ.get("PLATFORM JWT SECRET")
JWT ALGORITHM = "HS256"
JWT TTL SECONDS = int(os.environ.get("PLATFORM JWT TTL", str(30 * 24 * 3600)))
-if JWT SECRET == DEFAULT SECRET and os.environ.get("PLATFORM ENV", "dev") != "dev":
- raise RuntimeError(
- "PLATFORM JWT SECRET must be set to a strong random value in production. "
- "Set PLATFORM ENV=dev to suppress this check during development."
- )
+if not JWT SECRET:
+ if os.environ.get("PRAISONAI PLATFORM ALLOW INSECURE JWT") != "1":
+ raise RuntimeError(
+ "PLATFORM JWT SECRET must be set to a strong random value (min 32 bytes). "
+ "For local development, set PRAISONAI PLATFORM ALLOW INSECURE JWT=1 to "
+ "auto-generate an ephemeral random secret per process."
+ )
+ import secrets
+ JWT SECRET = secrets.token urlsafe(32)
+ # ephemeral; tokens issued before restart will not validate after restart
+ import warnings
+ warnings.warn("Using ephemeral JWT secret; set PLATFORM JWT SECRET in production")The guard now fails-closed: an unset
PLATFORM JWT SECRET raises at import unless the operator explicitly opts into dev mode with a separate variable. The dev-mode path generates a per-process random secret instead of using a hardcoded one, so even leaked dev-mode tokens cannot be used against another deployment. Add a startup banner that prints the JWT secret's hash prefix (not the secret itself) so operators can confirm at runtime which key is in use.Correção
Using Hardcoded Credentials
Encontrou algum problema na descrição? Tem algo a acrescentar? Fique à vontade para nos escrever 👾
Identificadores relacionados
Produtos afetados
Praisonai-Platform