PT-2026-52868 · Pypi · Bleach

Publicado

2026-06-16

·

Atualizado

2026-06-16

CVSS v3.1

4.3

Média

VetorAV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Summary

Bleach 6.3.0 exposes a documented email-linkification path through bleach.linkify(..., parse email=True). The implementation scans attacker-controlled text with EMAIL RE.finditer() over the full character token and has no length, timeout, or linear prefilter before applying the dot-atom email regex. A non-email payload around 30 KB causes multi-second CPU consumption per request/call, creating a direct availability risk for applications that enable email linkification on user-submitted text.

Affected Product

  • Package: bleach
  • Ecosystem: pip
  • Affected versions: verified in 6.3.0; exact first affected version not established
  • Patched versions: none known at finalization time
  • Tested version: 6.3.0
  • Audit commit/tag: v6.3.0 / 5546d5dbce60d08ccb99d981778d74044d646d4e
  • PyPI sdist SHA256: 6f3b91b1c0a02bb9a78b5a454c92506aa0fdf197e1d5e114d2e00c6f64306d22

Vulnerability Details

  • CWE: CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity; related availability impact maps to CWE-400
  • Component: bleach/linkifier.py, build email re(), LinkifyFilter.handle email addresses()
  • Root cause: handle email addresses() calls self.email re.finditer(text) on attacker-controlled text. EMAIL RE includes a repeated dot-atom local-part pattern, so non-email strings such as repeated a. segments with no @ force repeated long failing scans.
  • Security boundary violated: user-submitted text processed by a documented safe linkification helper should not allow an attacker to impose superlinear CPU cost through non-email text.
  • Direct impact: per-request CPU exhaustion / denial-of-service risk in applications that enable parse email=True on attacker-controlled text.
  • Chain impact, if any: one proof run observed an unrelated /health request delayed during a concurrent attack request, but this was not reliable across reviewer retests. Treat cross-request service degradation as environment-dependent supporting evidence, not the primary impact.
  • Severity estimate: Medium / availability-only. The feature is opt-in and deployment body limits/timeouts affect practical severity.
Relevant code path:
  • bleach/ init .py:85-125: public linkify(text, ..., parse email=False) constructs Linker(..., parse email=parse email) and calls linker.linkify(text).
  • bleach/linkifier.py:77-88: EMAIL RE is compiled from the dot-atom email pattern.
  • bleach/linkifier.py:292-301: handle email addresses() applies self.email re.finditer(text) to each character token.
  • bleach/linkifier.py:620-623: character tokens are routed into email handling only when parse email is true.
  • docs/goals.rst:30-40: Bleach documents user comments, profile bios, and descriptions as target untrusted text use cases.
  • docs/linkify.rst:300-305: parse email=True is the documented option for creating mailto: links.

Attack Preconditions

  • The consuming application enables the documented parse email=True option, for example bleach.linkify(user text, parse email=True) or Linker(parse email=True).linkify(user text).
  • The attacker can submit text that reaches that linkification path. Authentication depends on the host application; a public comment form would make this unauthenticated, while account-only text fields require user privileges.
  • The application allows roughly 20-30 KB of text to reach Bleach and lacks a strict timeout or input cap before linkification.
  • No custom bounded email re is supplied.

Reproduction

Minimal API trigger:
python
import bleach
payload = ("a." * 15000) + "a"
bleach.linkify(payload, parse email=True)
The saved HTTP proof uses a local harness with POST /preview calling bleach.linkify(request body, parse email=True) and a control endpoint using parse email=False on the same payload. The exploit sends baseline/control/attack requests over HTTP to 127.0.0.1.

Proof Evidence

The proof ran against Bleach 6.3.0 installed from the audited local checkout in an isolated temporary venv. It used Python 3.12.3 on Linux.
Measured HTTP proof results:
  • Payload: ("a." * 15000) + "a" (30001 bytes)
  • Normal baseline /preview mean: 0.001425 seconds
  • Same 30 KB payload with parse email=False: 0.048349 seconds
  • Attack payload with parse email=True: 8.719818 seconds
  • Slowdown versus the larger baseline/control mean: 180.35x
  • Requests sent by proof: 20
Evidence files: poc.py [poc results.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/27129737/poc results.json) [exploit proof.py](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/27129751/exploit proof.py) [exploit results.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/27129752/exploit results.json)

Scope and Limitations

  • This report does not claim XSS, authentication bypass, data disclosure, remote code execution, persistent crash, or persistent service outage.
  • parse email=True is not the default. The affected path is a documented opt-in feature.
  • The exact first affected version is not established.
  • Practical impact depends on host application input limits, worker model, request timeout policy, and whether untrusted users can submit text to an email-linkification path.
  • A reviewer reproduced the direct CPU cost but did not reproduce the proof harness’s /health delay. The direct impact claim is therefore limited to per-request CPU exhaustion.
  • Bleach is marked deprecated in README.rst, and SECURITY.md has stale supported-version text, but the package still has a 2025 PyPI release and published Mozilla security reporting routes.

Correção

DoS

Encontrou algum problema na descrição? Tem algo a acrescentar? Fique à vontade para nos escrever 👾
dbugs@ptsecurity.com

Enumeração de Fraquezas

CWE-1333

Identificadores relacionados

GHSA-G75F-G53V-794X

Produtos afetados

Bleach