PT-2026-42606 · Go · Github.Com/Fission/Fission

Published

2026-05-21

·

Updated

2026-05-21

None

No severity ratings or metrics are available. When they are, we'll update the corresponding info on the page.

Summary

Fission runtime pods were created with ServiceAccountName: fission-fetcher, and the fission-fetcher ServiceAccount was granted namespace-wide get on secrets and configmaps (it needs that to load function code, env vars, and config). The runtime pod's automounted token was reachable from inside the user's function container at /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token, so user-supplied function code inherited the same Kubernetes API privileges and could read any secret or configmap in the function's namespace — far beyond the Function.spec.secrets allowlist that the function specification suggests.

Affected component

  • pkg/executor/executortype/poolmgr/gp deployment.go:154-156 — pool-manager runtime pod ServiceAccountName.
  • pkg/executor/executortype/newdeploy/newdeploy.go:225-227 — new-deploy runtime pod ServiceAccountName.
  • pkg/utils/serviceaccount.go:51-64 — fission-fetcher RBAC: namespace-wide get on secrets / configmaps.

Impact

A user able to deploy or update a function in any namespace where Fission runtime pods are scheduled could:
  1. Read every secret in that namespace (TLS keys, OIDC client secrets, database credentials, cloud provider credentials).
  2. Read every configmap in that namespace.
  3. Use those credentials to pivot to other Kubernetes resources or external systems the secrets unlock.
This violates the principle that Function.spec.secrets is the authoritative declaration of which secrets a function can read.

Root cause

The fetcher sidecar legitimately needs the SA token to call the Fission control plane and fetch package archives. Setting ServiceAccountName: fission-fetcher on the pod gives every container in the pod (including the user container) the automounted token. Kubernetes does not provide per-container service-account scoping inside a single pod, so the user container has to be moved into a separate identity / token-mount scheme.

Fix

Released in v1.23.0:
  • PR #3366 (commit fe1842ef):
  • The user function container now sets AutomountServiceAccountToken: false at the container level (via projected-volume token suppression), so the user container no longer sees the pod's SA token even though the fetcher sidecar still does.
  • The fetcher sidecar retains its existing token mount (separate projected volume) since it needs cluster API access for its own work.
  • For the few legitimate use cases where a function needs its own Kubernetes API access, the user is expected to mount a different ServiceAccount via Function.spec.podspec with the minimum necessary RBAC (documented separately).

Mitigation (until upgrade)

  1. Restrict who can create / update Function and Package CRDs in your cluster — treat the ability to ship function code as equivalent to namespace-wide secret read.
  2. Reduce the fission-fetcher ClusterRole / Role scope where possible (e.g. constrain it to specific named secrets via separate Role bindings).
  3. Add NetworkPolicy egress rules denying function pods access to the Kubernetes API server (this blunts the token even if it leaks).

Improper Privilege Management

Weakness Enumeration

CWE-538CWE-269CWE-250

Related Identifiers

GHSA-85G2-PMRX-R49Q

Affected Products

Github.Com/Fission/Fission