PT-2026-52212 · Nlnet · Nsd
Qifan Zhang
·
Published
2026-06-25
·
Updated
2026-06-25
·
CVE-2026-12490
CVSS v4.0
8.2
High
| Vector | AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match.
Fix
Missing Authentication
Improper Access Control
Found an issue in the description? Have something to add? Feel free to write us 👾
Related Identifiers
Affected Products
Nsd